Archeology, Culture, Politics, scripture, theology

Online Reading (October 17, 2008)

Archaeology: The tomb of one of Marcus Aurelius’ generals is found in Rome.

Politics (sorta): Kenyan officials want an upgrade to the airport in Kisumu (Kenya) so that Air Force One can land there if Barack Obama is elected president. Obama also has a beer named after him there.

Religion and speech: Apparently it’s anti-Hindu to report the anti-Christian violence in Orissa. After all, it’s the missionaries’ fault for actually giving people an option other than Hinduism.

College Ministries: Russel Moore writes about the need to be not just in a campus ministry, but also a Church.

Standard
Culture, Law, scripture, theology

Online Reading (October 15, 2008)

*phew* lots to read today

Exegesis: A new site gives a tutorial on Biblical Arcing (a method of understanding texts by grapically representing the flow of the argument). If you prefer the method in a regular text, try “Interpreting the Pauline Epistles” by Tom Schreiner.

Study Bible: Speaking of which, today marks the launch of the ESV Study Bible, of which Tom Schreiner is one of the contributors. There is also a preview of the online version for the book of Matthew.

Culture: France’s political establishment warns that soccer matches in France may be called off if fans (often immigrants cheering the country of their birth)  jeer at the French National Anthem.

Pluralism: The Buddhists in South Korea are angry, believing that the Presbyterian president of the country is discriminating against them.

Law: an expression of the pain caused by legal “fishing expedition” medical malpractice filings (and the detriment to culture as a whole).

History: as an unmarried, balding, unemployed wannabe pastor with crooked legs, I am somewhat encouraged by the Historical Paul.

More History: An article debunking the idea that the majority of educated ancients believed that the world was flat (apologies to Washington Irving).

Standard
Culture, Ethics, scripture, theology

Online Reading (October 14, 2008)

Happy Election Day Canada!!! Though this cartoon summarizes my view of the election.

Law: the real life “grumpies” of france lose in their bid to change the name of a TV sitcom.

Legislating: Nebraska continues to find out why they should be careful in crafting laws, as another teenager is abandoned at a hospital there.

Film-making: Bill Maher lied to people to get them to be interviewed for his film religulous. I guess he’s now okay with the implied duplicity Ben Stein used get interviews for “Expelled”.

Bibles: Tim Challies reviews the new ESV Study Bible.

Standard
Atheism, Culture, scripture

Online Reading (October 2008)

(sorry for the long Hiatus, I think I’m back, now…)

Rationality: An opinion piece from the WSJ collates evidence that evangelical Christianity may be less likely to lead to pseudoscience than is a lack of religious affliliation.

Private Health Care: The local paper tells me that private health care is bad (seeminly acting as the mouthpiece for a pro-public health care group).

Religious Violence: anti-Christian violence continues for week 5 in Orissa, India. Hindus continue to blame Dalit Christians for killing a controversial swami while the (definitely not Christian) Maoists continue to claim responsibility.

Politics: Apparently, an increase in Saturday Night Live’s ratings has something to do with making fun of Sarah Palin (though the story doesn’t really explain the headline), and this is news at the CBC.

Standard
Rant, scripture, theology

Scripture, Authority and Function

All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work. (2 Tim 3:16)

I’ve noticed a trend among Churches that wish to express the truth of scripture (or the lack thereof) to focus their comments on whether or not the scriptures are factual (ie. accord to reality itself). While I have a very definite opinion on that particular debate (I believe that the Scriptures are true), I fear that the evangelical church may have missed something very importnat while debating the factuality of scripture, and conflated that with a debate about scriptural authority.

The common way of expressing trust in the authority of scripture is to say that it is “true” and that all decisions and teaching must accord with it. This is true, and a very necessary part of what Christians must mean when they say that scriptures are authoritative.My problem isn’t with whether or not that statement is a good expression of scriptural authority as far as it goe, but that it effectively does not go far enough.

When a Christian speaks about Biblical authority, I beleive that we must recognize that the authority of scripture is active. It has a point in the life of the believer and the Church. It fulfills a function. All of this is far more powerful than a passive “fact check” role for scripture. The result is that many in the Church can assert the validity and authority of scripture while never seeing it as important for the individual believer’s life. This is an unbiblical idea.

As we can see from the above quote, scriptural authority is a functional authority, it is good for teaching and reproof (usually more passive roles for most believers who are recipients of teaching, and receive reproof when they do something wrong), but it is also good for “training in righteousness that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work”.

This is far more than a claim that the scriptures are factually true, it is a claim that the scriptures fulfill a role of conforming the believer to a Godly image. Scripture alters the very believer personally so that they might effectively be different. It is not just an appeal court, nor just a “life manual”. It is a training manual. We do not simply check it when we have a decision to make, or when we need instructions for some situation we find ourselves in (though it is useful in those roles too), but primarilly the Christian interacts with scripture to interact with the word of God and to be changed by it. It is a training manual as well as a basic instruction book.

The result is that rather than letting our Bibles be read haphazardly as we feel the need, or as a way of checking the ideas we face, or even of personal inspiration, the Bible should be read by believers as a training regime. We read it not just to be educated, but to be transformed. A believer reads the Bible, not just when they feel the need, but regularly, because to do otherwise is to ignore it’s function.

So a believer should:

1) Read the Bible regularly. Yes, even when you don’t feel like it. I don’t always feel like going to the gym every day. While I can often get away with not exercising for a day or two, flab comes back if I ignore it too long. The same is true of our training in Godliness for which the Bible is useful.

2) Read the Bible systematically. I generally find it easier to focus on training that which I can already do well, but the scripture says that we are to be prepared for every good work, not just the ones that fit our desires for today. I can’t just focus on the red letters in the Gospel, or just the New Testament, or just the letters, as to do so would give me unbalanced training. Balanced training is why the gym has many exercise machines, and it’s why the Bible has many books. Christians should avail themselves of everything God has provided for our development.

3) Read the Bible reflectively. It won’t be much help if you simply hurry through the scriptures without taking the time to reflect on it, and understand if you’ve got what it’s saying right. At the gym, I can misuse machines so that my training doesn’t help me, or worse, harms me. At the gym that means I check to be sure I’m doing it right, for scripture, I reflect on it.

Grace to you all, dear readers.

Standard