Jesus, Rant, scripture, sin, theology

Pharoah, Hardened Hearts and Vested Interests

When the king of Egypt was told that the people had fled, Pharaoh and his officials changed their minds about them and said, “What have we done? We have let the Israelites go and have lost their services!”
So he had his chariot made ready and took his army with him. (Ex 14:5-6, NIV)

Pharoah vs. Moses

The commonly told story of Pharoah and the Israelites in the book of Exodus (see, for example The Ten Commandments with Charlton Heston), often paints the leader of the Egyptians as a slightly unflattering megalomaniac. As with most god-kings, there’s probably some truth to that, but to a lesser extent, what we see in Pharoah is a reflection of what seems to happen to a lesser extent in our own hearts.

People often assume that we are somehow objective viewers of the world around us, that we do not interpret the many points of data entering into or consciousness (or even into our subconscious) every moment of every day. The simple fact is that, no, we interpret everything into a means that our minds can comprehend, and this comprehension is shaped by (among other things) our own interests.

Pharoah is a perfect example. While he has clear and repeated proof that something was going on around him, he believed it was anything else, rather than believe that the God of the Israelites was actually more powerful than him and his gods, and that this powerful God wanted his people back.

The reasons were pretty simple.

The Israelites were economically beneficial to Egypt (so they would lose wealth by letting them go), and the Egyptians had been persecuting them (meaning that the existance and power of this God of the oppressed might take those centuries of persecution out of Egyptian hide). In the case of both eventualities, it is better to believe that there is no such problem, than to admit that there is such a God.

In the past, I have found myself doing the same thing. When I am engaged in something I know to be against the will of God, I prefer to believe that God is okay with it (contrary to what God has said about it in the Bible), or even that maybe there is no God, so it is unnecessary to give up the sin that I enjoy for the sake of God. In both cases, I am engaged in a willfull ignorance. I am reacting with a hardened heart, rather like Pharoah.

I can value other things as greater than God, and then interpret the universe based on that valuing. That interpretation is capable of dealing with contrary opinions, and even with evidence clearly contradicting my blindness. I make other things my god, and in so doing literally become blind to the real God, mainly because I don’t want to see Him, it would cost too much to see Him. I’m rather like Pharoah in those times.

It is for that reason that I need a new heart. The sins that flow from that are based in a desire not to see God for fear of losing a cherished sin.

Luckily, that’s what Jesus promises to (and actually does, in my experience) provide.

Standard
Culture, Ethics, Jesus, Law

Online Reading (June 10, 2008)

Lord’s Gym: Seriously, I can’t make this up. Where would Jesus work out?

Imagine: Yoko Ono loses the suit designed to keep Ben Stein from using the song “Imagine” in Ben Stein’s film “Expelled”. It’s still fair use to quote others when critiquing them.

Human Rights?: If you’re a Christian in Alberta, this decision should give you pause. The people involved are ordered to say nothing “disparaging”  about homosexuals. (note: not just hateful or defamatory… anything disparaging).

Immigration: Canada fails to renew a work visa because the person (dying of cancer) would put undue strain on our socialized medicine. I’m so glad that we’re compassionate enough to have that,

Standard
Jesus, Rant, scripture, theology

Messengers versus Theologians

Okay, I know that the title is a false dichotomy. The problem is that I don’t think most know that it’s a false dichotomy, hence the reason I’m writing this.

In my travails to find a method of paying for food while I hopefully preach the Gospel in St. John’s after finishing my MDiv, I have had many conversations with pastors, and people in authority over denominations.

The most common question I get is what my goals are for future ministry. While I don’t always say it this way, my only desire is to prayerfully preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ accurately to people who need to hear it. The reason for this goal is simple, it’s what a pastor does. Yes, there is counseling, and visiting, and a host of administrative tasks, but all of those stem from the God-empowered accurate expression of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

It’s important to remember that the task isn’t one of creativity (save in the means by which you preach it). The message is set, and we don’t get to change it. The Gospel is good news that we do not create, we simply report. Otherwise, we have a good story and not good news. The Gospel is a good story, but not one I wrote. I am called to accurately interpret the scriptures (yes, there is interpretation, but again, it is bounded by accuracy… I interpret what is actually there) to people who are around me, and if a pastor, to those entrusted to me.

This led, in at least one case, to a rather strange conversation about false teaching, theology, and the pastoral call. The man I was speaking to believed strongly in “love” as the central tenet of the Gospel (quite true, but open to misinterpretation), and felt that as long as we were doing good, we were preaching the Gospel.

He was wrong, of course. Good works are a proper and necessary effect of believing the Gospel (and if you are not moved to it by the Gospel, I doubt that you have heard it rightly), but it is not the Gospel itself. The Gospel is what we see in scripture as Christ crucified for our sake, that we might become fit worshipers of a gracious God. God becomes my surpassing treasure, and the good news is that there is a means of getting that eternally in Jesus Christ, through only the work of God for the glory of God.

This led to another short exchange about the question of false doctrine (which he referred to as debating about words). Indeed, there is fruitless theological discussion. There are many important distinctives between denominations that are not central to the Gospel, and we should not treat those with fundamental seriousness. But there are some questions that are central to the Gospel. For example, the statement that good works is preaching the Gospel actually subverts the Gospel. It makes good works for the benefit of others the goal of the Gospel. Thus the ultimate “good” of the good news becomes humanity, or society, but not God. Indeed, it is a close cousin of another false belief that says we are justified by our good works.

This is a central disagreement, where questions of baptism, the tribulation, the sequence and relative value of Spiritual giftings, (while important) are not.

Discerning between the two, using the witness of scripture in the unity of the Church (meaning the company of believers now and throughout history), is proper theology. In essence, theology is about discerning the accuracy of the Gospel we preach. In this sense it is important.

I was little surprised then when the same man claimed then that theology wasn’t that important overall, or that it was too academic. Indeed, bad theology is that, though I would say that he was engaging in that version of theology as we spoke. He was choosing to interpret the revelation of God in a way that ignored the center of the Gospel. He was engaged in bad theology. Had it been good theology, he would have taken the time to question whether what he was saying accorded with scripture. That is good theology, and so far from being academic, it is at the crux of a pastor’s work.

Good theology, the theology that is completely Biblical (meaning using the whole of scripture), helps the pastor to preach the Gospel rightly. That is intensely practical for people in congregations, as it is only the Gospel of Jesus Christ that saves.

We are primarily messengers, and only theologians insofar as it makes us better messengers. We dare not reverse those, as if the message serves only our own private theology, we end up preaching a lie.

Standard
Atheism, Blogging, Jesus

The Vaguaries of Google and the Reason for Moderation.

Okay, for some reason, the graphic I have at the top of my post “Why do People Go To Hell” has been taken up by the image search at google. The result is that my website has been getting copious amounts of hits recently (at least for me). This is a weird feeling, as the post in question is one of my least favorite, and now I suddenly have some people happening by my site (and me not having written anything recently).

Unfortunately, this also makes for the reason that I set my comments to “moderate” as I have recently been getting many comments seemingly designed to vent people’s frustration with my belief structure, with very little in the way of actual reasoned response. I’ve been allowing some, but from now on I’ll delete unless there’s some kind of reasoning behind the statements.

I’ll also probably delete the ones made up almost entirely of swearing.

Standard
Culture, discernment, evangelism, Jesus, repentance

Crucifying What I Can’t Afford

jesus_cross_crucifixion.jpgThe Bible says that I am to “by the Spirit put to death the deeds of the flesh” (Romans 8:13b) so that I may live. I used to think that that was just the things that are “sinful”, meaning all the negative rules that people consider to be part of the Christian religion…. you know, don’t lie, don’t cheat, etc. etc.. I’m not so sure anymore.The fact is that I am supposed to be living a life that is focussed on God. God really is worth all the effort, but it’s often easier to focus on immediate pleasures; ones Religious people often think are sinful (like sex, drugs, etc.) and some that they think are okay (reading, thinking, playing games) and things that are in the grey area (movies, video games, music etc,).

It seems that in Romans 8 though, Paul has a different idea entirely. We are alive to the Spirit and dead to the flesh. This isn’t a wacky desire to have ecstatic Spiritual giftings, but rather a desire to live towards the one the Spirit testifies to, Jesus Christ. It’s a fairly simple thing, when I spend time on something, is it trying to gratify my desire for more of Jesus, or is it something that is simply making my flesh a little happier? One is a good idea, the other is a bad idea, but in practice they might look like the same act.

For example, I write this blog so that hopefully a gorgeous redhead or blonde supermodel Christian will happen upon this blog and fall in love with me: bad idea. I write this blog in the hope of making people love Jesus more: good idea (even if there’s a side effect of someone falling in love with me and us going on to glorify Jesus in a married life). Different goals, same act, but if the goal is wrong it’s a deed of the flesh. If the deed springs from a love of something other than Jesus, it needs to be crucified, it’s distracting from the real goal. I can’t afford it.

Getting more of Jesus in my life, making my life reflect more of Christ, and making others actually think Jesus is really awesome, is going to take everything I’ve got (and judging by some who read this blog, I have an uphill battle). doing good stuff for any reason other than that means I have less with which to seek Jesus, so I can’t afford it.

Standard